Evaluating Web-Table Interpretation Methods

From TC11
Revision as of 11:57, 4 August 2010 by Dimos (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'Datasets -> Current Page {| style="width: 100%" |- | align="right" | {| |- | '''Created: '''2010-08-03 |- | {{Last updated}} |} |} =Description= Interpretation is a req…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Datasets -> Current Page

Created: 2010-08-03
Last updated: 2010-008-04

Description

Interpretation is a requisite for understanding web-tables [1], and crucial for building table ontologies for the Semantic Web [2]. Since complete automation is difficult, interactive interpretation methods have been developed in literature [1, 3]. Performance on this dataset can be used to compare newly-developed methods.

Evaluation Protocol

Comparison of different methods for the proposed task can be based on the human time required for interactive table interpretation, i.e., to reach the ground truth from raw data.

Related Dataset

Related Ground Truth Data

References

  1. Jha, P., Nagy G.: Wang Notation Tool: Layout Independent Representation of Tables. In: Procs. Nineteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2008), Tampa, Florida (2008)
  1. Embley, D. W., Lopresti, D., Nagy, G.: Notes on Contemporary Table Recognition. In: Procs. Seventh IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS 2006), Bunke, H., and Spitz, A. L. (Eds.), Nelson, New Zealand, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3872, pp. 164-175, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
  1. Padmanabhan, R., Jandhyala, R. C., Krishnamoorthy, M., Nagy, G., Seth, S., Silversmith, W.: Interactive Conversion of Web Tables. In: Procs. Eighth IAPR International Workshop on Graphics Recognition (GREC 2009), City University of La Rochelle, France, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6020, Springer, Heidelberg (In Press) (2010)

This page is editable only by TC11 Officers .